Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadiya Kichenok vs Jia-Jing Lu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kichenok vs Lu analysis and find out who is favored!
Nadiya Kichenok vs Jia-Jing Lu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kichenok 1 - 0 Lu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kichenok has won 47.92% of points on their second serve, while Lu has won 48.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kichenok, in recent form, has won 51.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lu has won 57.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.86% and 41.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kichenok has saved 35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lu has saved 54.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kichenok has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Lu winning 60.81% (W/L 45/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kichenok has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 55/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 41/ 47). Lu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 367/ 250), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 22% (W/L 2/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Kichenok has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Lu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.19% of matches (W/L 41/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kichenok winning 1 times and Lu being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kichenok winning 2 and Lu winning 1. The last match between Kichenok and Lu was at the Quanzhou, 07-01-2013, Quarterfinals, Hard with Nadiya Kichenok getting the victory 6-1 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kichenok and Lu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kichenok winning 1 times and Lu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kichenok winning 0, and Lu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kichenok has played against opponents with an average rank of 543.5 while Lu has played against players with an average rank of 260.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kichenok has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lu has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kichenok has converted 52.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lu has converted 48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
703
Rank
100
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
295
Rank
162
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
55% (204-166)
Career Total W/L
57% (457-344)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
62% (18-11)
$66,148
Career Prize Money
$61,427
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nadiya Kichenok vs Jia-Jing Lu For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kichenok VS Lu
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nadiya Kichenok | Jia-Jing Lu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadiya Kichenok | Jia-Jing Lu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 62% (18/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 59% (38/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (21/27) | 54% (305/255) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 64% (14/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 71 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 104 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:28 | 1:31:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 543.5 | 241.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (110/158) | 63% (1069/1707) |
| 1st Serve W% | 48% (53/110) | 63% (675/1069) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (23/48) | 47% (302/638) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (10/19) | 49% (115/235) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (75/163) | 47% (841/1771) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 62% (18/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 62% (18/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 88% (17/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 12% (17/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Nadiya Kichenok Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Raveena Kingsley
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
102)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Catherine Harrison
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Christina Mchale
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Nadiya Kichenok
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jia-Jing Lu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Sohyun Park
86%
(
55 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Fangzhou Liu
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Ho Ching Wu
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
6
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Viktoria Morvayova
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Yanyi Zhou
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
6 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Xinxin Yao
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kichenok Vs Lu Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kichenok are available here and Lu photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
